Alcohol and Other Drugs in the Workplace

An Overview

The Cost

Employee Assistance Programs

General Motors Corporation's EAP saves the company $37 million per year -- $3,700 for each of the 10,000 employees enrolled in the program.13

United Airlines estimates that it has a $16.95 return for every dollar invested in employee assistance.14

Northrop Corporation saw a 43% increase in the productivity of each of its first 100 employees to enter an alcohol treatment program. After three years' sobriety. the average savings for each was nearly $20,000.15

Philadelphia Police Department employees undergoing treatment reduced their sick days by an average of 38% and their injured days by 62%.16

Oldsmoblie's Lansing, Michigan plant saw the following results in the year after its alcoholic employees underwent treatment: lost man-hours declined by 49%, health care benefits by 29%, leaves by 56%, grievances by 78%, disciplinary problems by 63% and accidents by 82%.17

Treatment Issues

Sources
1National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1990, 1991, p.94. 2M. Bernstein, J.J. Mahoney, "Management Perspectives on Alcoholism: The Employer's Stake in Alcoholism Treatment," Occupational Medicine, Vol.4, No.2 (1989), pp.223-232. 3G. Ames, W. Delaney, "Minimization of Workplace Alcohol Problems: The Supervisor's Role," Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Research Society on Alcoholism, Vol.16, No.2 (April 1992), p.185. 4National Institute on Drug Abuse, "Research on Drugs and the Workplace," NIDA Capsules, June 1990, p.1. 5"1991 AMA Survey on Workplace Drug Testing and Drug Abuse Policies," American Management Association Research Reports, Eric Greenberg, ed., p.1. 6D.P. Rice, S. Kelman, L.S. Miller and S. Dunmeyer, The Economic Costs of Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness. Report submitted to the Office of Financing and Coverage Policy of the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, 1990, p.26. 7Bernstein and Mahoney. 8U.S. Department of Labor (USDL), What Works: Workplaces Without Drugs, August 1990, p.3. 9Thomas E. Backer, Ph.D., Strategic Planning for Workplace Drug Abuse Programs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1987, p.4. 10Bernstein and Mahoney. 11National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers (NAATP), Treatment Is the Answer: A White Paper on the Cost Effectiveness of Alcoholism and Drug Dependency Treatment, March 1991, p.1. 12USDL, What Works: Workplaces Without Drugs, p.17. 13ASIS O.P. Norton Information Resources Center, Substance Abuse: A Guide to Workplace Issues, August 1990, p.23. 14Ibid. 15D. Campbell and M. Graham, Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace: A Guide for Managers, (New York: Facts on File Publications, 1988), p.9. 16lbid. 17lbid. 18Thomas R. Burke, "The Economic Impact of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism," Public Health Reports, Vol.103, No.6 (Nov/Dec.1988), p.567. 19U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, Report 760: Survey of Employer Anti-drug Programs, January 1989, p.2. 20H.D. Holder, J.O. Blose, "Alcoholism Treatment and Total Health Care Utilization and Costs: A Four-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Federal Employees," Journal of the American Medical Association, No.256 (1986), pp.1456-1460. 21NAATP, Treatment is the Answer, p.2. 22A. Foster Higgins & Co., Inc., Health Care Benefits Survey 1989.


National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence
of the Central Mississippi Area, Inc.
5846 Ridgewood Road
Suite C-101
Jackson, MS 39211

Email: information@ncaddcenms.org
601-899-5880 Fax: 601-899-5548
Monday-Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.